ASIC compliance

The only ASIC HITL-compliant content platform for financial professionals.

When ASIC asks how your AI-generated content is governed — and they will ask — you need an answer. FinanceLocal is that answer.

The regulatory landscape

ASIC is auditing operating models, not just outputs.

ASIC’s 2026 Information Integrity outlook flagged agentic AI as a systemic risk. The regulator is auditing operating models, not just outputs.

The CBA document fraud scandal intensified scrutiny on the entire broker channel — ASIC’s expectation is that licensees can demonstrate the governance behind what reaches consumers, not just the consumer-facing artefact.

The gap between “using AI” and “governing AI” is where ASIC’s attention is focused.

  • 65%

    of brokers have no documented AI strategy.

    Source — ASIC 2026 Information Integrity outlook

  • 3%

    have formal AI governance policies.

    Source — MFAA / FBAA broker channel survey

  • 2026

    ASIC named agentic AI a systemic risk.

    Source — ASIC 2026 outlook

What ASIC expects

The four things ASIC has signalled — repeatedly.

This isn't speculation. It's the direction ASIC has set out across its 2024 AI guidance, the 2026 outlook, and channel-specific notices to MFAA and FBAA members.

  • Human oversight.

    A licensed professional reviews AI-generated content before it reaches consumers. Not a delegated team member. Not an automated rule set.

  • Clear accountability.

    A named licensed professional must approve outputs. The line of responsibility cannot end at an algorithm or a vendor.

  • Audit trails.

    The licensee must be able to demonstrate what was generated, what was reviewed, what was changed, and what was published — for any post, any time.

  • Governance framework.

    A documented process, not ad-hoc usage. ASIC's expectation is operating-model evidence, not screenshots after the fact.

The HITL architecture

How FinanceLocal delivers this.

HITL isn't a setting we toggle. It's how the platform is built.

  • Every piece of AI-generated content passes through explicit human approval.
  • The approver is the licensed broker — not an admin, not an algorithm.
  • Every approval is timestamped, logged, and exportable.
  • Rejection reasons are tracked, improving content quality over time.
  • The compliance dashboard shows a complete audit trail per post.
  • Export-ready reports for ASIC reviews or aggregator audits.
Audit trail · Last 7 days
  • Post #142 · TikTok + Instagram

    Published

    Today · 09:14

    Generated, compliance-checked, broker-approved 09:15 (28s)

  • Post #141 · LinkedIn

    Published

    Today · 07:02

    Generated, compliance-checked, broker-approved 07:03 (44s)

  • Post #140 · Facebook

    Rejected

    Yesterday · 18:11

    Broker note: "wrong tone for our audience" — regenerated as Post #142

  • Post #139 · TikTok + LinkedIn

    Published

    Yesterday · 13:46

    Generated, compliance-checked, broker-approved 13:47 (52s)

Filterable by date, platform, status4 events shown · 32 in last 30 days
What everyone else is doing

The Frankenstein stack — and why it's the risk.

Most brokers using AI have stitched together point solutions with no compliance layer connecting them. That's the gap ASIC is auditing.

  • Copy-paste from ChatGPT to Canva.

    No audit trail. No approval process. No governance documentation. If a post contains misleading information, there is no record of who reviewed it.

  • Separate scheduling tools.

    Buffer or Hootsuite scheduling AI-generated posts written elsewhere. The publishing record exists but the generation and review steps don’t.

  • Design tools handling content production.

    Canva, Adobe Express, Figma. Visual output without the source of truth or sign-off chain that ASIC expects.

  • No layer that connects them.

    Three or four tools, each correct in isolation, none of them aware of the others. FinanceLocal replaces the entire stack with a single governed pipeline.

Built for what’s coming

The architecture for the regulations that are coming.

  • The signal

    ASIC hasn't finalised agentic AI regulations yet — but the direction is clear from the 2024 AI guidance, the 2026 outlook, and aggregator-channel notices.

  • The early-mover position

    Brokers who build governance now will be ahead when rules land. Brokers who scramble later will pay more — in time, cost, and reputation risk.

  • Where we built it

    FinanceLocal's HITL architecture is designed for where regulation is heading, not where it was. The compliance posture is the platform, not a bolt-on.

Compliance FAQ

Specific questions, specific answers.

The compliance and regulatory questions brokers, aggregators, and licensees have asked us most.

No. FinanceLocal is a technology platform, not a financial services provider. The broker remains the responsible licensee. FinanceLocal provides the governance infrastructure for the broker's AI content.

Start with Content Shield — $49/week. Every post governed by HITL approval and a full audit trail. No retroactive policy build, no scrambling later.